Bestiality, Zoophilia and Human–Animal Sexual Interactions

[UntamedAnomaly]

This is a rather lengthy read, but is a newer article and quite detailed.

https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/1....2019.0290

[silverwolf1]

Interesting, skewed, flawed in it's final paragraph and thus it's conclusion, relying much too heavily on Linda Lovelace's attempts to pretty herself up in her 'autobiography' to project the appearance of abuse into the article from the start. To their final lines I say, when I start eating dogs and exploiting their carcasses etc., I'll admit I cannot be in love with a dog. Generalizations. The article lives on them.




sw

[caikgoch]

She seems to have a strong men=evil subtext too.

[threelegs]

Too long; I didn't finish it. But I've seen a vid of Linda Lovelace going at it with a dog, and I can't say I've ever seen a more enthusiastic encounter by anyone. I've seen enough woman/dog porn to recognize true enthusiasm, as opposed to faking it for a paycheck. Most revealing to me was how she gave head: the fakers grab the dick and half-heartedly lick at the sides of it, mostly, and drool a lot to fake or avoid getting a mouthful of cum. Linda took the whole thing down, clear past the knot, and don't ask me where she put it all; the dog was pretty respectably hung. Also, she seemed to pretty much ignore the camera.




I also recall reading a review of Deep Throat, and the reviewer made particular note of her enthusiasm, which set her apart from so many porn actresses. So, I don't think she was a money-slut, I think she was an uninhibited nympho who got exploited.




It sees to me that if she was being insincere, it was with her whitewashing of the events, although she probably did have some regret about her past reputation. We'll never know, though.

[HeartBeatOfTheBeast]

On 5/18/2019 at 4:21 PM, threelegs said:




But I've seen a vid of Linda Lovelace going at it with a dog

Sorry for the necro-post but wouldn't anyone thats films zoo porn not be representative of the zoo community and thus biased? I mean for example how often do 'normal' people film themselves having sex?

[heavyhorse]

14 hours ago, HeartBeatOfTheBeast said:




Sorry for the necro-post but

IMO adding new perspective to an old thread is beneficial. 




I know "some forums" got snarky when old discussions were revived, but we weren't all here when some threads were new.   




So let's go back behind the barn and see if we can get the old quarter-ton started up again..... 




  

[Ramseys]

2 hours ago, heavyhorse said:




So let's go back behind the barn and see if we can get the old quarter-ton started up again..... 

Yea... work on a pick up... sure.

[heavyhorse]

9 hours ago, Ramseys said:




Yea... work on a pick up... sure.

Mmm-- Meet me in the dark recesses of the barn.  Nothing with critters outdoors anymore since a guy showed up at the door selling the "negatives" of drone photography of the sheep in the field.  He said.  Made it clear I would be buying the "negatives".  




Played dumb.  Didn't look.  Said Not interested.    (Yeah I had been engaged in "outdoor activities".  Prove it was me.  But if I bit I was screwed.)




-----------------------  




Back in the day "quarter ton" was military designation:  "U.S. Army Truck, 1⁄4-ton, 4×4, General Purpose".    "GP"  ("Jeep").  Usually Willys.  You could buy them surplus for a few hundred $.  They were pretty common behind the barn with the old implements.  They are pretty rare now, though I saw one last year, no engine or tranny.  (The gov't doesn't sell them anymore except as scrap iron, cut into 4 pieces.  Lawyers put an end to them.  They had a nasty habit of flipping over if you got stupid with them.   Get stupid with a army surplus jeep?  Nah.  Never happen..... )




Personally I think a better solution would have been to cut the lawyers into 4 pieces and sell them as scrap.  But that's just me.




OK call the PC Police now..... 




 




  

[silverwolf1]

14 hours ago, heavyhorse said:




Personally I think a better solution would have been to cut the lawyers into 4 pieces and sell them as scrap.  But that's just me.

I agree, but lets stay on topic if we can heh. And <a contenteditable="false" data-ipshover="" data-ipshover-target="<___base_url___>/profile/4614-heartbeatofthebeast/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="4614" href="<___base_url___>/profile/4614-heartbeatofthebeast/">@HeartBeatOfTheBeast</a>, the whole purpose of this Forum is discussion & debate, you and all members are encouraged to revive all the old threads you can! [img]<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/smile.png[/img]/emoticons/[email protected] 2x" title=":)" width="20" /> 




sw

[threelegs]

On 8/7/2020 at 9:51 PM, HeartBeatOfTheBeast said:




Sorry for the necro-post but wouldn't anyone thats films zoo porn not be representative of the zoo community and thus biased? I mean for example how often do 'normal' people film themselves having sex?

We'll never know, but I wouldn't be surprised if the number came up pretty high.